012394Facultatief Protocol bij het Verdrag inzake de rechten van het kind inzake een communicatieprocedurenlVerdragMinisterie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport2024-02-082014-01-14Mensenrechten2011-12-19New York2014-04-14falsefalseMultilateraalTotstandgekomenNederland (in Europa)Nederland (Bonaire)Nederland (Sint Eustatius)Nederland (Saba)ArubaCuraçaoSint MaartenAlbanië2012-09-242013-05-292014-04-14Rtruefalse2013-05-29According to article 12, first paragraph of the Optional Protocol, the Republic of Albania hereby declares it accepts the competence of the committee to receive and examine the communications in which a State party claims that another State party does not meet its obligations under the instruments referred to in this paragraph [to] which the State is a party.Andorra2012-09-262014-09-252014-12-25RfalsefalseArgentinië2012-07-252015-04-142015-07-14RfalsefalseArmenië2019-09-262021-03-242021-06-24RfalsefalseBelgië2012-02-282014-05-302014-08-30Rtruefalse2014-05-30The Kingdom of Belgium recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive, pursuant to article 12 of the Optional Protocol, communications from a State party which claims that another State is not fulfilling its obligations.Benin2013-09-242019-08-192019-11-19RfalsefalseBolivia2013-04-022014-04-14TfalsefalseBosnië en Herzegovina2017-07-112018-05-172018-08-17RfalsefalseBrazilië2012-02-282017-09-292017-12-29RfalsefalseChili2012-02-282015-09-012015-12-01Rtruefalse2015-09-01The Republic of Chile declares, in accordance to article 12, entitled Inter-State Communications, of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under any of the following instruments to which the State is a party: the Convention; the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography; and to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the involvement of children in armed conflicts.Costa Rica2012-02-282014-01-142014-04-14RfalsefalseCyprus2012-07-272017-09-112017-10-11RfalsefalseDenemarken2015-10-072016-01-07Ttruefalse2015-10-07Territorial exclusion with regard to Greenland and the Faroe Islands.Duitsland2012-02-282013-02-282014-04-14Rtruefalse2013-02-28The Federal Republic of Germany recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications pursuant to Article 12(1) of the Optional Protocol.
Ecuador2013-04-242018-09-192018-12-19RfalsefalseEl Salvador2013-07-25falsefalseFinland2012-02-282015-11-122016-02-12Rtruefalse2015-11-12The Republic of Finland declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider inter-state communications made against it provided for in Article 12 of the Protocol.Frankrijk2014-11-202016-01-072016-04-07RfalsefalseGabon2012-09-252014-04-14TfalsefalseGeorgië2016-09-192016-12-19TfalsefalseGhana2013-09-24falsefalseGuinee-Bissau2013-09-24falsefalseIerland2014-09-242014-09-242014-12-24RfalsefalseItalië2012-02-282016-02-042016-05-04Rtruefalse2016-12-20... pursuant to Article 12 (1) of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure, done at New York on 19 December 2011, the Italian Republic declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under the instruments referred to in this Article.Ivoorkust2013-09-24falsefalseKaapverdië2012-09-24falsefalseKazachstan2023-02-072024-02-072024-05-07RfalsefalseKroatië2013-12-272017-04-182017-07-18RfalsefalseLiechtenstein2012-09-242017-01-252017-04-25Rtruefalse2017-01-25According to Article 12 of the Optional Protocol from 19 December 2011 to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, the Principality of Liechtenstein declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that the Principality of Liechtenstein does not fulfil its obligations under any of the following instruments: the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict, or the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.Litouwen2015-09-302022-10-032023-01-03RfalsefalseLuxemburg2012-02-282016-02-122016-05-12RfalsefalseMadagaskar2012-09-24falsefalseMalediven2012-02-282019-09-272019-12-27RfalsefalseMali2012-02-28falsefalseMalta2012-04-18falsefalseMarokko2012-02-28falsefalseMarshalleilanden2019-01-292019-04-29TfalsefalseMauritius2012-08-13falsefalseMoldavië2023-09-222023-12-22TfalsefalseMonaco2014-09-242014-12-24Ttruefalse2014-09-24Pursuant to Article 13, paragraph 7, of the Protocol, the Principality of Monaco wishes to indicate that it does not recognize the competence of the Committee provided for in the present article in respect of the rights set forth in the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.Mongolië2013-10-042015-09-282015-12-28RfalsefalseMontenegro2012-02-282013-09-242014-04-14RfalsefalseNieuw-Zeeland2022-09-222022-12-22Ttruefalse2022-09-22... consistent with the constitutional status of Tokelau and taking into account the commitment of the Government of New Zealand to the development of self-government for Tokelau through an act of self-determination under the Charter of the United Nations, this Accession [by New Zealand] shall not extend to Tokelau unless and until a Declaration to this effect is lodged by the Government of New Zealand with the Depositary on the basis of appropriate consultation with that territory…Oekraïne2014-11-202016-09-022016-12-02Rtruefalse2016-09-02Ukraine states that for the period of temporary occupation of a part of the territory of Ukraine – the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol – as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation and until complete restoration of the constitutional order and effective control by Ukraine over such occupied territory, as well as over certain districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, the application and/or implementation by Ukraine of the obligations under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, as applied to the aforementioned occupied and uncontrolled territory of Ukraine, is limited and is not guaranteed.Oostenrijk2012-02-28falsefalsePalestina2019-04-102019-07-10TfalsefalsePanama2017-02-162017-05-16TfalsefalseParaguay2012-09-262017-01-202017-04-20RfalsefalsePeru2012-02-282016-01-062016-04-06RfalsefalsePolen2013-09-30falsefalsePortugal2012-02-282013-09-242014-04-14Rtruefalse2013-09-24The Portuguese Republic declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child in accordance and for the purposes of article twelve of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, adopted in New York, on the nineteenth of December of two thousand and eleven.
Roemenië2012-06-13falsefalseSamoa2016-04-292016-07-29TfalsefalseSan Marino2018-09-262018-12-26Ttruefalse2021-05-17The Republic of San Marino declares, in accordance with article 12 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, that it recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications in which a State Party claims that the Republic of San Marino does not fulfil its obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict or the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.Senegal2012-10-01falsefalseServië2012-02-28falsefalseSeychellen2013-09-242021-06-072021-09-07RfalsefalseSlovenië2012-02-282018-05-252018-08-25Rtruefalse2018-05-25Pursuant to Article 12, paragraph 1, of the said Protocol, the Republic of Slovenia declares that it recognises the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under the instruments in this paragraph.Slowakije2012-02-282013-12-032014-04-14Rtruefalse2013-12-03The Slovak Republic recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications pursuant to Article 12 (1) of the Optional Protocol.
Spanje2012-02-282013-06-032014-04-14RfalsefalseThailand2012-09-252012-09-252014-04-14RfalsefalseTsjechië2015-04-302015-12-022016-03-02Rtruefalse2016-05-20Pursuant to Article 12 (1) of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communication Procedure, the Czech Republic declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications according to this article.Tunesië2018-12-142019-03-14TfalsefalseTurkije2012-09-242017-12-262018-03-26Rtruetrue2017-12-26The Republic of Turkey declares with regard to the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child as provided for by the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, that the reservations and declarations it made to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in armed conflict and to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography fully retain their validity.Cyprus2018-09-14The Republic of Cyprus has examined the Declaration made by the Republic of Turkey on the 26th of December 2017, upon ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure (2011), limiting the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to those States Parties which it recognizes and with which it has diplomatic relations. In the view of the Republic of Cyprus, this Declaration amounts to a Reservation.
To this effect, the Republic of Cyprus would like to state that the Objections it has made in respect of the Declarations/Reservations of Turkey with regard to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in armed conflict and to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, fully retain their validity and apply equally to the Reservation of Turkey in respect to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure.Uruguay2012-02-282015-02-232015-05-23RfalsefalseZwitserland2017-04-242017-07-24Ttruefalse2017-04-24Pursuant to article 12 (1) of the Protocol, Switzerland recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications under this provision.003908Verdrag inzake de rechten van het kind1989-11-20New York